FSU to represent AMP staff
The Finance Sector Union (FSU) will represent AMP staff at today’s annual general meeting and have “some tough questions for the board” on how the firm is planning to restore its reputation after the revelations from the Royal Commission.
The FSU’s warning on its approach came amid clear indications from institutional investors that they would be opposing the company’s remuneration report. For its part, the union said it was fighting for a fairer finance industry where workers would be rewarded, not penalised, for prioritising compliance and customer service.
According to national assistant secretary, Nathan Rees, FSU workers at AMP would like to know “how errors like ‘fee for no service’ were able to continue for so long without being detected”.
“The Finance Sector Union has spent the last decade fighting against a system that preferences profit over customer interest. This culture is an anathema to community expectations and has eroded the position of trust that finance institutions hold in Australian society,” he said.
“The finance sector union has spent the last decade fighting against a system that preferences profit over customer interest. This culture is an anathema to community expectations and has eroded the position of trust that finance institutions hold in Australian society.
“The failures identified by the Royal Commission are largely attributable to a failure of culture – reflected in the prioritisation of incentive and commission-based payments over salaries, cutting staff who perform compliance and administrative functions, the undervaluing of compliance, and the focus on revenue over service.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
