FSU continues battle over Westpac sales targets
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c0b0/0c0b08abf43882fb5c19402cb4a079182b8435a3" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c0b0/0c0b08abf43882fb5c19402cb4a079182b8435a3" alt="image"
The Financial Sector Union (FSU) has called its members to say exactly how much unpaid work they have to do to, if any, to achieve their sales targets.
This comes after Westpac said its sales targets for the 2014 financial year - which are up to 20-50 per cent higher than the previous year - are reasonable, because a large number of staff were meeting them.
“Meanwhile, we’re hearing that many staff are doing extraordinary things to avoid the problems associated with not making target,” the FSU said to its members in a statement on its website.
Earlier this year, it was reported that over 500 Westpac staff working in personal banking, home finance management and business banking had complained to the union about the increase, claiming it did not reflect the customer base.
The FSU also received reports that, in some areas, Westpac managers were asking staff to sign individual coaching session/performance agreements.
After receiving the response from the banking group, the union has posed a number of questions to its members, asking them to share their stories about how easy - or difficult - it is to meet those sales targets.
“We say that just because you are reaching your targets, it doesn’t make them reasonable,” FSU said.
“Are you working unpaid overtime to get your work done? If so, how much overtime (paid or unpaid) do you work in a typical week,” the union asked.
“Have you missed any family events or other occasions because you needed to remain at work so you could meet your performance objectives?
“Is other work not being done, or are staff being forced to take shortcuts to meet targets?”
The FSU said it intends to use these examples in its discussions with the bank, in search of a solution to the problems caused by the new targets.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.