FSU concerned over proposed remuneration model for NAB financial planners
Members of the Finance Sector Union (FSU) have expressed concerns around proposed changes to the remuneration model for National Australia Bank (NAB) financial planners.
The proposal was to put planners in November 2012 following discussion through the NAB consultative committee, the FSU stated.
NAB advised planners that the changes would take effect by the end of 2012, but due to "data issues" this was subsequently delayed to February.
According to the FSU, its members have concerns surrounding the changes including:
- loss of future revenue
- damage to established businesses
- NAB's attempt to rush the change through before Christmas, and
- data error issues including inaccurate list of customers.
"Members are also telling us they feel that NAB isn't playing fairly by trying to change the terms of the Enterprise Agreement through consultation," the FSU stated.
"This is a matter for renegotiation through agreement negotiations later this year."
The FSU said a number of members have signed an authority notifying NAB that they want their union representing them on this matter.
Without widespread support, NAB will argue that the majority of planners have accepted the changes, the FSU added.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
