FSRA web wider than many think

property financial services reform funds management australian financial services investments commission

15 August 2002
| By Barbara Messer |

TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) licensing web will snare a growing number of unsuspecting professionals employed outside the realm of financial services, who may not be aware of their obligation to apply for an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence.

Accountants, valuers, engineers, quantity surveyors and architects — indeed, anyone offering professional advice for inclusion in prospectuses for property trusts and syndicates — are all liable to feel ASIC’s regulatory gaze under the current terms of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA).

“Every day we are coming across organisations and individuals not involved in the formal business of funds raising or funds management, that are incredulous when they discover the Act may apply to them,” Teys McMahon Legal lawyer Greg McMahon says.

According to McMahon, property valuations appearing in prospectuses are a form of financial advice, and property valuers could thereby be required to hold an FSR licence, as could anyone who contributes their expertise to prospectuses.

“This is regulatory overkill, and people are reluctant to believe that the FSRA could apply to them,” McMahon says. “There are three options: many people won’t comply, some may outsource the licensing function, and others may try and get a licence, though this is a complex and expensive process,” he says.

Property developers and venture capitalists engaging in mezzanine funding or ‘excluded offers’, which raise funding from a limited number of investors, may also find themselves obliged to obtain FSRA licences if their fundraising activities are perceived by ASIC to be a form of funds management.

ASIC is already struggling to process licence applications from financial advisory industry participants, with only 71 applications being finalised since the FSRA came into effect in March 2002.

ASIC will need to start processing around 350 applications per month if it is to meet its two-year deadline, and now faces the additional task of licensing players outside the industry, McMahon says.

This is not a task that ASIC is necessarily happy to take on, but the commission has no legal basis on which to exclude outside players from the FSRA under its current terms, McMahon says

“ASIC needs to end the uncertainty and find a sensible resolution to confusion surrounding the FSRA,” he says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS