FSRA is core of systemic failures: NIA
The Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) has created an industry structure that deprives consumers of non-product based advice, according to the National Institute of Accountants (NIA).
The way the financial advice industry has been structured under FSRA is at the root of recent systemic failures, and as such a review and restructure of the entire system is required, according to the NIA.
In its submission to the Ripoll inquiry, the NIA expressed concern over the industry structure created by the FSRA, which is “more focused on regulating entities rather than creating a system of independent advisers”. This has resulted in a system “bogged down in paperwork and regulations”, without ensuring that the advice given is useful to the client.
Those who wish to give advice are beholden to complex disclosure requirements, the NIA said.
“This may sound fine from a regulatory point of view, but from a commercial point of view it is disastrous.”
The NIA said the “only way money can be recouped by advisers is through selling a large amount of product and not wasting time on non-commercial generic advice”.
“Therefore, the adviser must be either licensed and need to sell product, or they are not licensed and cannot say much of anything,” the NIA said.
“This is leaving a hole where clients need information the most: of a generic, non-product based variety.”
Among its recommendations to the committee, the NIA proposed a three-tiered structure for financial advisers, with each tier licensed to provide different types of advice.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
