FSR refinements: more headaches for planners

financial planning industry SOA compliance financial services reform federal government financial planners financial planning association director

20 October 2005
| By Ross Kelly |

Federal Government moves to cut the compliance burden on the financial planning industry could backfire, creating more questions than answers for advisers.

Despite a lengthy consultation process with the industry over refinements to Financial Services Reform (FSR), confusion remains over new Statement of Advice (SOA) requirements contained in draft legislation released last week.

As part of the refinements, it has been proposed that financial planners will not have to issue subsequent SOAs after their first consultation with a client, but only if the basic nature of the advice, and the client’s personal circumstances, do not change significantly.

But members of the financial planning industry have expressed fears that a refusal by the Government to decipher exactly what constitutes a “significant” change in a client’s personal circumstances could render the refinement, which was intended to lighten the paperwork burden on financial planners, unworkable.

Lonsdale technical services manager Lucille Benitto said the decision not to provide specific guidance left advisers “wide open to take a beating from ASIC”.

“Once you have broad legislation it leaves people in uncharted territory, and the worst thing anyone wants is this leading to compliance taking a ‘belt and braces’ approach and just doing another SOA to be safe,” she said.

Menico Tuck Financial Services director Joanne Tuck said for the refinements to be workable, the Government must take the risk of future hassles with the corporate regulator away from planners by providing more guidance, such as suggesting what a planner should do if a client changes their job or has a baby.

The Financial Planning Association, however, said it was happy for the law to let an adviser choose what constitutes a significant change in their client’s personal circumstances.

“We have always put forward that FSR should be more principles based than prescriptive. If you prescribe the rules in black letter law — that defeats the whole purpose of the refinements,” a spokesperson said.

The Government will allow feedback on the draft legislation until November 4.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS