FSI unlikely to create ructions for advice sector

financial services sector financial advice financial services companies australian securities and investments commission

18 June 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Service Inquiry (FSI) should not greatly impact the financial services sector with most recommendations relating to improvements at the margins according to an analysis of the 270 submissions made to the inquiry.

KPMG stated that it had examined all the submissions made to the FSI and found that stakeholders had not identified any substantive reforms that were required but did seek ways to remove overlap between regulations administered across state and federal levels.

"After a period of significant regulatory change, it is encouraging to note that the initial submissions to the FSI do not suggest that the insurance and wealth management financial system requires substantive reforms, rather there is support for simplification and rationalisation, " KPMG Actuarial & Insurance Risk Consulting Partner in Charge James Collier said.

He said there were common themes within the submissions which would shape the potential outcomes of the FSI with the superannuation sector likely to focus on the needs of consumers during retirement phase, enhanced regulations to improve oversight and governance, and the management of systemic risk and liquidity requirements.

Likely changes with the life and general insurance sectors would be around the rationalisation of regulations and the possible removal of state insurance taxes and charges to tackle underinsurance.

Collier stated that higher levels of disclosure and improvements in the quality of advice would also need to take place with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) calling for additional intervention powers to regulate financial services products.

In its analysis KPMG also noted that submissions from different groups of stakeholders had common themes with regulators stating the financial system was working well but still requested additional powers.

Larger financial services companies also believed the system worked well but sought less regulation while smaller players believed they were disadvantaged due to their size.

Consumers stated they were concerned with about the levels of disclosure within the sector and the quality of financial advice and the level of access to financial products available to parts of the community.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS