FSI education benchmark applauded, but exam questioned
Industry advocate groups have broadly welcomed the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) interim report’s vow to lift the education bar for advisers, but one has questioned the validity of an overarching exam.
The SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) applauded the report’s acceptance that advisers needed an educational benchmark, but questioned the validity of a sit down test.
“SPAA does not support the implementation of a national exam for financial advisers as we believe there are too many risks inherent in this approach,” its CEO, Andrea Slattery, said.
“The mere passing of an exam is evidence of past knowledge and financial planning is about practical judgment and understanding the future.
“It is essential that financial planners are continually kept up to date by a system of accreditation that includes continuous professional development that is independently assessed in both technical and practical competencies.”
Support for lifting educational standards for advisers was widely endorsed, with the Financial Planners Association (FPA) and Financial Services Council (FSC) both quick to applaud the interim report’s suggestion.
The FPA was particularly pleased the inquiry raised lifting competency standards and releasing a public register of advisers.
In his speech to the National Press Club, chairman of the FSI David Murray said the report raised some concerns about the quality of advice in Australia and canvassed further powers for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
