FSC strongly opposes greater powers for ASIC

law ALRC ASIC FSC

5 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has strongly warned against greater regulatory power being given to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

In a response to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) interim report B into financial services legislation, the FSC said it had already seen a “blurring of the lines” between ASIC’s roles as regulator and law-maker.

This led to concerns that any extra law-making powers delegated to ASIC would be difficult to monitor and review.

“While it is both a regulator (law enforcer) and law-maker, its law-making role is theoretically confined to making technical rules, or dealing with matters of detail and instruments that should not involve matters of ‘policy’. However, in practice this line has sometimes blurred.

“Under the ALRC proposed new legislative hierarchy, given the seemingly greater scope of law-making power to be held by ASIC, it will be even more important to establish clear boundaries and guardrails to ensure that any actions taken by ASIC are appropriately monitored and reviewed to ensure that matters of policy are dealt with by Parliament. Even if they are put in place, the FSC has concerns that in practice these boundaries and guardrails will not be effectively enforced.”

The FSC acknowledged the regulatory system in the UK had a similar model with its Financial Conduct Authority but that this was different to the constitutional model in Australia where ASIC’s role was to enforce and administer the law.

Regarding criminal offences including those that lead to imprisonment and significant civil penalties, and administrative penalties, the FSC said these should remain the domain of primary legislation rather than delegated to ASIC.

“To the extent these matters are delegated, it would be preferable to have limited power delegated to the Minister (rather that ASIC). Any potential role for ASIC in dictating public law sanctions in the form of penalties (offences, civil penalties and infringement notices), even if they are considered minor, should be treated with great caution and consulted on widely before it is taken further.”

Instead, the FSC recommended a separate body was set up to make and maintain delegated legislation which would comprise delegates from Treasury and ASIC plus an independent chair and allow ASIC to have input without sole power.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

6 days 21 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS