FSC says set boundaries for ASIC/APRA
The Financial Services Council (FSC) has sent a strong signal to the Government that it believes Australia’s financial services regulators need to operate within stricter boundaries with respect to Government policy formulation and executive.
The message has been delivered by FSC chief executive John Brogden, who used a speech yesterday to suggest his organisation would be pressing the issue in its submission to the Financial Systems Review.
Addressing an FSC/Deloitte Leadership Series lunch, Brogden said the FSC was evaluating the regulatory architecture of Australia’s financial system “to assess what changes could be made to facilitate it better meeting” a set of principles including efficiency and competitive neutrality.
“We believe that the current twin peaks model is robust and appropriate,” he said. “However, the scope and role of the two regulators needs to be examined.
“On too many occasions over the past few years the Parliament has ceded its authority to regulators,” Brogden said. “We strongly believe the role of Parliament is to write the law and the role of regulators is to enforce it.”
The FSC chief executive said it was on this basis that “the exact boundaries of the regulators need to be set and adhered to”.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.