FSC backs life insurance changes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaa29/aaa2900389125127883c6024238b8cd731dab6a7" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaa29/aaa2900389125127883c6024238b8cd731dab6a7" alt="image"
The Financial Services Council (FSC) has thrown its support behind extending Unfair Contract Terms regime to life insurance, so long as adjustments are made to allow the extremely long-term nature of life insurance contracts to continue.
The organisation said it felt the adjustment was ‘strongly in the interest of consumers’ as it allowed people to keep their life insurance as long as necessary.
The FSC submission was in response to Recommendation 4.7 of the Financial Services Royal Commission, extending unfair contract terms to insurance contracts.
In 4.7, the Royal Commission’s objectives were to ensure consumers and small businesses who purchased insurance received the same access to protections from unfair terms in such contracts as they did for financial services contracts.
FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said: “It makes perfect sense for life insurance to have the unfair contract terms applied, because all customers of life insurance deserve to know their contracts are fair.
“However, it is important to note that life insurance contracts are different from almost every other type of contract in that they can remain in force for 50 years or more.
“Almost everything that forms the basis of a life insurance contract can change in such a long period. There may be changes in medical science that prolong our life expectancy, changes to employment structures or cures for illness that currently impact our lifestyles.
“We want Australians to keep their life insurance cover for as long as they need it, without having to apply for a replacement policy each year.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.