FSC backs life insurance changes
The Financial Services Council (FSC) has thrown its support behind extending Unfair Contract Terms regime to life insurance, so long as adjustments are made to allow the extremely long-term nature of life insurance contracts to continue.
The organisation said it felt the adjustment was ‘strongly in the interest of consumers’ as it allowed people to keep their life insurance as long as necessary.
The FSC submission was in response to Recommendation 4.7 of the Financial Services Royal Commission, extending unfair contract terms to insurance contracts.
In 4.7, the Royal Commission’s objectives were to ensure consumers and small businesses who purchased insurance received the same access to protections from unfair terms in such contracts as they did for financial services contracts.
FSC chief executive, Sally Loane, said: “It makes perfect sense for life insurance to have the unfair contract terms applied, because all customers of life insurance deserve to know their contracts are fair.
“However, it is important to note that life insurance contracts are different from almost every other type of contract in that they can remain in force for 50 years or more.
“Almost everything that forms the basis of a life insurance contract can change in such a long period. There may be changes in medical science that prolong our life expectancy, changes to employment structures or cures for illness that currently impact our lifestyles.
“We want Australians to keep their life insurance cover for as long as they need it, without having to apply for a replacement policy each year.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.