FPA warns against regulatory overkill

FPA financial services reform compliance australian financial services fpa chief executive financial planners financial planning firms financial services licence treasury government australian securities and investments commission chief executive

10 September 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has written to the Government warning that unless exemptions are granted, financial planning firms will be encumbered by a double regulatory burden as a result of the new National Consumer Credit Protection legislation.

FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the approach being adopted by the Treasury and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), if continued, would mean that Australian Financial Services Licensees would be required to take on another layer of regulatory compliance.

“Requiring a licence simply to be able to provide effective budgeting and debt management advice as part of a financial plan is overkill,” she said.

Bloch said the organisation had written to the Government seeking exemptions and pointing out that Australian Financial Services Licence holders and financial planners were already subject to a higher standard of legislative obligation under the Financial Services Reform Act.

She said the potential doubling up of regulation had occurred despite assurances to the contrary by ASIC and Treasury.

The FPA has expressed its concerns at the same time as ASIC has released a consultation paper detailing how it intends administering the new legislative framework.

That consultation paper, while not dealing with lending with respect to margin loans, effectively outlined a regime similar in nature to the obligations already imposed on financial planners in terms of the suitability of financial advice.

The consultation paper’s statement that “the key responsible lending obligation is that licensees must ensure that they do not provide a credit contract or lease to a consumer (or suggest, or assist a consumer to enter into, a credit contract or lease) that is unsuitable for the consumer”, demonstrates the degree to which the new legislation mirrors the intent of the Financial Services Reform Act.

Bloch said the FPA believes that the root cause of the problem is the definition of ‘credit assistance’ within the new legislation, which is too broad and captures very basic and obvious issues relating a client’s financial position.

She said these were elements already effectively dealt with by financial planners every day under the auspices of the Financial Services Reform Act.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 month 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 months 1 week ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

6 days 4 hours ago

Lonsec has appointed a new chief executive for its research and ratings division as Mike Wright takes up a new role in light of the acquisition of Evidentia Group by Lons...

1 month ago

The Financial Services and Credit Panel has cancelled the registration of an NSW adviser for two years as it felt he displayed a ‘level of incompetence’ in providing advi...

1 month ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS