FPA ‘tired’ of industry fund opt-in agenda
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has described recent comments from sections of the trade union superannuation movement advocating an opt-in payment structure for financial advice as ‘alarmist’.
Opt-in would result in many Australians being locked out from accessing quality financial advice and would result in poor savings and retirement outcomes for many Australians, the FPA stated.
“The opt-in proposal is bad public policy that will harm more Australians than it will benefit,” said FPA chief executive Mark Rantall (pictured).
Opt-in would introduce administrative complexity, confusion and increased compliance costs, he said.
The FPA has embraced transparent guidelines banning upfront and trailing commission payments, which effectively renders opt-in redundant. The FPA stated that proponents of opt-in were running a myopic campaign that could endanger the financial futures of many Australians.
“The FPA is tired of the industry fund one-track agenda, and with the removal of commission-based payments can see no logical reason for continuing this time-consuming debate,” the FPA statement said.
The comments follow recent research commissioned by the Industry Super Network (ISN) and conducted by Rice Warner that found the cost of implementing opt-in for the industry would be negligible, and would “ensure adviser remuneration is aligned with personal exertion like other professions”.
A recent Money Management survey found that many planners thought opt-in would add more than 10 per cent to their costs and that they would be passing on that cost to their clients.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
