FPA suggests risk rating financial products
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3090/d3090ff90ae9f0066e5b7ab8e01f8d0877905ea1" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3090/d3090ff90ae9f0066e5b7ab8e01f8d0877905ea1" alt="image"
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has suggested that the Government should consider applying a risk rating to financial products, utilising guidance from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
In a submission filed with the Senate Economic Legislation Committee, the FPA has suggested that target market determinations of products with high risk ratings should be required to include a stronger consumer warning and a recommendation to seek personal financial advice about the product.
The submission, part of the Senate Committee’s review of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Design and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention Powers) Bill 2018, also saw the FPA urge the parliamentary committee to ensure the consumer protection mechanisms introduced under the Future of Financial Advice reforms, particularly the best interest duty, were not impacted by the new legislation.
“There is no benefit, and potentially a significant consumer detriment, in also applying the product design and distribution obligations to personal financial advice,” the FPA submission said.
“While the target market determinations to be introduced under this Bill are a positive step forward, some products are complex and present a significant risk to consumers that may not be fully represented or understood under the requirements in the Bill,” it said, suggesting that a risk rating might be considered.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.