FPA removes Perth Chapter chair

FPA/chairman/financial-planning-association/money-management/executive-director/

13 September 2006
| By Liam Egan |
image
image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

Former Perth Chapter chairman Julie Matheson has responded to her removal from the position by the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA) national board last week by announcing her own candidacy for the national board.

Matheson was ‘permanently removed’ as chapter chairman on September 6 for reasons she claims are “invalid”.

She told Money Management that she would not divulge “information on these reasons” now, but may be prepared to do so in a media release during her campaigning for the forthcoming national board elections, the results of which are due to be announced at the FPA conference in November.

Perth chapter chairman since March 2005, she said she had been “nominated for the elections on a platform of reforming the FPA in the interests of professional financial planners’ representation, rather than a head office corporate agenda”.

News of Matheson’s removal as Perth Chapter chairman came by way of her own media release yesterday, which she suggested was motivated by another example “of a head office agenda [running the FPA], rather than members’ interests”.

She said in the release that the FPA “decided not to inform its members of this decision [to remove her], but I feel compelled to do so because there are key matters of principle at stake here”.

“These go to the heart of the reforms required to return the FPA to a vigorous, member-engaging, open, accountable association that professional financial planners can identify with.”

FPA executive director Jo-Anne Bloch told Money Management that the FPA national board “took action on this particular matter after a lengthy period of discussion with Ms Matheson dating back to 2005”.

“The FPA board is required to protect all members from exposure to legal liability, and in so doing the board has taken action accordingly,” she said.

“We need to make it very clear that this action is reflective of a requirement to protect our members’ interests.

“It is in no way a reflection of stifling member debate, or in no way representative of the board’s desire not to encourage healthy and active debate.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

3 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND