FPA reinforces Westpoint commission stance
By Ross Kelly
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has said the nature in which commissions were disclosed to Westpoint clients, not just the size of commission payments, should be the main focus of any investigations into planner conduct.
Financial planners have come under public scrutiny and are potentially facing a number of legal actions over claims they received commissions in excess of 10 per cent for recommending products associated with the failed developer.
An FPA spokesperson said that the regulatory focus should be on ensuring that customers know what they are paying and what they are paying for.
The spokesperson did, however, add: “Given that disclosure requirements are already quite extensive, the FPA would need to carefully consider the implications on our members of any additional requirements. Disclosure itself does not guarantee good advice.”
The FPA’s comments came as it released a statement to the media confirming that it had received another 13 written complaints from members about Westpoint in addition to the 10 it was already investigating.
The spokesperson’s comments regarding commissions echo an earlier statement made by FPA chair Corinna Dieters to the public broadcaster.
“Commissions of around 10 per cent seem unreasonably high in respect to the investments that have been recommended to the clients. The FPA doesn’t have any specific requirement about the level of commission which is payable to advisers,” Dieters told the ABC in early March.
Advisers found by the FPA to be in breach of its professional standards face expulsion from the association and fines of up to $20,000.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
