FPA reinforces Westpoint commission stance
By Ross Kelly
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has said the nature in which commissions were disclosed to Westpoint clients, not just the size of commission payments, should be the main focus of any investigations into planner conduct.
Financial planners have come under public scrutiny and are potentially facing a number of legal actions over claims they received commissions in excess of 10 per cent for recommending products associated with the failed developer.
An FPA spokesperson said that the regulatory focus should be on ensuring that customers know what they are paying and what they are paying for.
The spokesperson did, however, add: “Given that disclosure requirements are already quite extensive, the FPA would need to carefully consider the implications on our members of any additional requirements. Disclosure itself does not guarantee good advice.”
The FPA’s comments came as it released a statement to the media confirming that it had received another 13 written complaints from members about Westpoint in addition to the 10 it was already investigating.
The spokesperson’s comments regarding commissions echo an earlier statement made by FPA chair Corinna Dieters to the public broadcaster.
“Commissions of around 10 per cent seem unreasonably high in respect to the investments that have been recommended to the clients. The FPA doesn’t have any specific requirement about the level of commission which is payable to advisers,” Dieters told the ABC in early March.
Advisers found by the FPA to be in breach of its professional standards face expulsion from the association and fines of up to $20,000.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
