FPA rebuts industry funds on best interest
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has sought to strongly rebut industry fund suggestions that the Government’s proposed changes to the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) arrangements will compromise planners’ best interest obligations.
In a strongly-worded statement issued this evening, FPA chief executive Mark Rantall referred to the “rhetoric and unnecessary scare-mongering” which was clouding the facts about proposed amendments to the best interest duty.
He said Australian consumers had nothing to fear from the proposed changes and indicated that those who suggested otherwise were acting in a self-interested manner.
“We are witnessing an extraordinary effort by product providers and those who represent them to build a political position - based on flimsy arguments - in defence of a redundant section of FOFA pertaining to the best interests duty,” he said. “In this case the facts really do speak for themselves. Consumers have nothing to fear from the proposed amendments.”
The FPA has issued a statement regarding what it says are the facts about the best interests duty, particularly the fact that it is a statutory obligation and that the industry had pushed for the safe harbour steps.
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
