FPA reaffirms support for advice-based fees

FPA fpa members financial planning advice commissions remuneration fee-for-service financial planning association financial advisers chief executive

8 May 2006
| By Sara Rich |

MLC has thrown its support behind the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA) advice-based fee model.

The FPA Principles to Manage Conflicts of Interest will become part of the association’s professional standards on July 1, requiring members to identify the cost of advice and come to an agreement with their clients over what the fee for advice should be.

In a speech to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia last week, MLC chief executive Steve Tucker urged financial advisers to structure their business models to accommodate fee-for-service.

“I believe the decision to include a fee-for-service option needs to be considered by all financial advisers,” he said.

“In practical terms, this means the unbundling of advice, product and administration fees as separate line items on a client’s annual statement.

“I want to make clear that I am not advocating that commissions end tomorrow or be banned…rather, I am urging advisers to consider the long-term benefits of a fee-for-service model and get ahead of the curve.”

FPA chair Corinna Dieters said Tucker’s comments were a ringing endorsement of the association’s new principles.

“It is clear MLC and a number of other FPA members are moving in the direction of an advice-based fee model,” she said.

“There is growing awareness among consumers that financial planning advice is a professional service which is valuable in its own right.

“Increasingly, clients will decide how they choose to pay for this advice.”

The FPA’s new principles are made up of four key requirements:

1. The cost of financial planning advice should be separately identified and should be disclosed to clients on a regular basis.

2. All FPA members must offer products that suit the needs of the client and do not bring the industry into disrepute.

3. No remuneration or benefits paid by a FPA principal member to one of their financial planners should be biased or not in the interests of the client.

4. Separate corporate governance arrangements should govern FPA principal members and any related financial services provider.

Principles three and four become effective on January 1, 2007.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 4 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 6 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS