FPA ready for ASIC's code upgrade

FPA/ASIC/financial-planning-association/FOFA/financial-advice-reforms/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/future-of-financial-advice/

24 October 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) will be ready to go with its updated professional code of conduct as soon as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) "hits the go button", according to the association's general manager for policy and standards Dante De Gori.

"We've been lucky that we've been speaking to ASIC, and have been developing our thoughts around the amendments around our code, but I don't think there are too many surprises in there," he said.

The FPA yesterday announced it would be upgrading its code in line with the changes.

ASIC included a limited number of examples in the consultation paper elaborating on how a code could obviate the need for a planner to opt-in. These included regularly advising clients of their ability to opt out and a complete ban on ongoing asset-based remuneration.

De Gori said the specific examples in the consultation paper represented an area ASIC had been struggling with, but that was why there was a consultation process, and the FPA had already looked at various possible scenarios.

"It is a consultation paper and they're looking for feedback. This is new territory for them, but it does show glimpses of what ASIC's thinking," he said.

"One of the things we're emphasising is that this is a great opportunity to update the code, not just to bring it in line with these changes but to future-proof it. This isn't just about [Future of Financial Advice reforms]," he said.

De Gori said it was important that any professional code maintained the principle that planners should only be paid for services they actually delivered - the original intent of the opt-in measure.

By obviating the need to comply with that part of the regulation, the code would provide flexibility for planners to deliver those services without the prescriptive requirement of a two-year opt-in process.

He said the FPA's code would also go above what was required under opt-in, in that the government provision effectively allowed planners to go two years without being obligated to contact a client, but the FPA code would require planners to review clients regularly, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 days 1 hour ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND