FPA questions ASIC licensing system
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has called for an investigation into the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) licensing system that allows product providers to hold their own Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).
In a submission to the parliamentary inquiry into agribusiness managed investments schemes (MIS), the FPA said a regulatory arrangement in which a product provider also holds an AFSL which authorises representatives to sell a single MIS product should be investigated in terms of its appropriateness.
“A key difference between agribusiness MIS and other financial products is the existence of dedicated sales networks to support sales of investments ...,” the submission stated.
The FPA questioned the quality of financial advice in such cases where an authorised representative was limited to recommending a single product. Financial planners must cover the full suite of client needs and, by definition, cannot be restricted to a single product distribution.
The FPA said consumers might be misled by distribution models that meet the regulatory standards of other participants but are dedicated sales channels for one product.
Financial planners' advice should have a reasonable basis and be appropriate to the client, the submission said.
Recommended for you
Professional services group AZ NGA has made its first acquisition since announcing a $240 million strategic partnership with US manager Oaktree Capital Management in September.
As Insignia Financial looks to bolster its two financial advice businesses, Shadforth and Bridges, CEO Scott Hartley describes to Money Management how the firm will achieve these strategic growth plans.
Centrepoint Alliance says it is “just getting started” as it looks to drive growth via expanding all three streams of advisers within the business.
AFCA’s latest statistics have shed light on which of the major licensees recorded the most consumer complaints in the last financial year.
