FPA emphasises advice affordability to Parliamentary Committee

fpa chief executive superannuation funds self-managed superannuation funds financial planning association financial services reform superannuation industry chief executive

24 October 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |
image
image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

The key message of the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA) presentation to the Parliamentary Committee conducting the inquiry into the Structure and Operation of the Superannuation Industry was the need to make advice affordable for all Australians.

“We absolutely support financial services reform but there are a number of issues that still require refinement and some attention to be able to actually deliver affordable advice to a number of Australians,” FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

To illustrate the current situation in terms of advice and how much people should pay for it, the FPA provided the committee with a real life case study illustrating the amount of work involved in providing consolidation advice for a client who had membership in eight different superannuation funds.

The case study showed that by the time all of the legal obligations were fulfilled, the value of the service calculated on a standard hourly rate for the industry amounted to $4,400, a price many average Australians would not have been able to afford.

On the basis of practicality, the client was eventually charged $740 for the work performed, highlighting the commercial limitations of the system as it presently stands.

The FPA also clarified its stance on education surrounding superannuation and investing. It believes there should be no real distinction between education and advice and as such education should flow on from an advisory perspective.

“In summary, we certainly support greater education but we feel that if education comes from an advisory aspect you have no issues. If you are providing education and you’re asked the next question, ‘Which fund shall I invest in?’, then invariably you’ve moved into the advice space and you’re going to have to refer the person onto somewhere else,” Bloch explained.

The FPA was asked by the committee to compile two supplementary submissions. One is to do with defining the different advice models in the marketplace to make it easier for consumers to understand the basis of the advice they will be receiving.

The other submission involves self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) that will discuss such issues as whether or not a minimum level of assets should be required before the establishment of an SMSF should be recommended to a client.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS