FPA emphasises advice affordability to Parliamentary Committee

fpa chief executive superannuation funds self-managed superannuation funds financial planning association financial services reform superannuation industry chief executive

24 October 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |
image
image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

The key message of the Financial Planning Association’s (FPA) presentation to the Parliamentary Committee conducting the inquiry into the Structure and Operation of the Superannuation Industry was the need to make advice affordable for all Australians.

“We absolutely support financial services reform but there are a number of issues that still require refinement and some attention to be able to actually deliver affordable advice to a number of Australians,” FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said.

To illustrate the current situation in terms of advice and how much people should pay for it, the FPA provided the committee with a real life case study illustrating the amount of work involved in providing consolidation advice for a client who had membership in eight different superannuation funds.

The case study showed that by the time all of the legal obligations were fulfilled, the value of the service calculated on a standard hourly rate for the industry amounted to $4,400, a price many average Australians would not have been able to afford.

On the basis of practicality, the client was eventually charged $740 for the work performed, highlighting the commercial limitations of the system as it presently stands.

The FPA also clarified its stance on education surrounding superannuation and investing. It believes there should be no real distinction between education and advice and as such education should flow on from an advisory perspective.

“In summary, we certainly support greater education but we feel that if education comes from an advisory aspect you have no issues. If you are providing education and you’re asked the next question, ‘Which fund shall I invest in?’, then invariably you’ve moved into the advice space and you’re going to have to refer the person onto somewhere else,” Bloch explained.

The FPA was asked by the committee to compile two supplementary submissions. One is to do with defining the different advice models in the marketplace to make it easier for consumers to understand the basis of the advice they will be receiving.

The other submission involves self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) that will discuss such issues as whether or not a minimum level of assets should be required before the establishment of an SMSF should be recommended to a client.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS