FPA Dealer Principal Conference – Exit plan adds value

financial planning commissions financial planning business financial planning firms financial planning practice

31 August 2000
| By John Wilkinson |

The difference in valuation between an average financial planning business and a premium business can vary by up to $370,000 depending on a number of factors, says MGI Meyrick Webster senior partner Bob Neill.

His accountancy practice has recently valued a number of financial planning firms to allow succession plans to come into force.

"We see a lot of small, fragmented businesses that have strong goodwill based on an individual," he says.

When his practice values planning firms, it looks at turnover, profit and capital base, the same principles for valuing any firm.

The differences with planning firms are factors such as geographical location, business structure, funds under management and brand names.

"If the business has a managed style that ensures procedures are repeatable and transparent, then we have a marketable business," Neill says.

"And if we have a turnkey operation, the business is a significantly more valuable asset."

A growing threat to financial planning practice valuations is litigation. Neill admits that industry regulations are making the planner more liable and litigation is inevitable in the future.

Other factors affecting the valuation include client demographics, income streams and the fact that fees are better than commissions. Automation of the practice leads to more efficiency and the staff is also considered.

Neill quoted a case study of an average financial planning firm with a turnover of $1 million and $300,000 profits. The practice had $75 million of funds under administration.

The value range of this business would be between $1.296 million and $1.386 million.

If the same figures were applied to a premium financial planning firm, the value would be between $1.665 million and $1.758 million.

To achieve the higher valuation Neill recommends principals start thinking about the method of disposing of the company four to five years ahead.

"This timescale will allow the principal to achieve their valuation goal through understanding the factors that influence the value of the practice," he says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS