FPA criticised over Storm Financial
Financial services commentator Paul Resnik has used a column to be published in Money Management next week to strongly criticise both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in the wake of the Storm Financial collapse.
Resnik claims that the FPA appeared to have been too meek to condemn what he described as the misuse of financial products and warned that the resulting public relations fallout could create a loss of confidence in the broader financial planning community.
Resnik was particularly critical of the fact that the FPA had failed to criticise the manner in which margin lending had been utilised in the strategies recommended to Storm clients.
He warned there was a real risk the Government would see fit to regulate in circumstances where it might be argued that financial planners needed special qualifications before being able to promote gearing.
He said the Storm collapse had raised questions about the overall structure of the Australian financial planning sector and, in particular, the relationship between lenders, fund managers and dealer groups such as Storm.
Resnik said he regarded the Storm collapse as more than just a storm in a teacup and he believed it was likely it would be referred to a Senate committee of inquiry.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
