FPA considers backing industry compensation scheme

financial planners FPA insurance financial services reform professional indemnity federal government insurance industry

17 February 2003
| By George Liondis |

TheFinancialPlanning Association(FPA) will consider backing a proposal to set up a national scheme, possibly funded by an industry levy, to compensate investors for losses suffered at the hands of unscrupulous financial services providers.

The proposal is just one of a range of options the FPA is considering endorsing as part of a bid to ensure consumers have access to adequate compensation arrangements.

Under the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA), due to come into effect in March 2004, all financial planners need to provide clients with access to ‘adequate compensation arrangements’.

However, the FSRA does not spell out exactly what the term ‘adequate compensation arrangements’ actually means, prompting the Federal Government to call for submissions on the topic.

The FPA is in the final stages of consulting its members before making its recommendations to the Government by the end of this month.

Other options being considered by the FPA include leaving financial planners to fall back on their own professional indemnity (PI) cover to meet the ‘adequate compensation arrangements’.

However, FPA national manager of policy and government relations Con Hristodoulidis says this option may not be viable in the current environment, where many insurers are only providing limited PI cover to financial planners.

“The difficulty with PI is obviously going out and getting a premium because the insurance industry is putting exclusions [into insurance contracts] that are not warranted,” Hristodoulidis says.

The FPA is also assessing an option where a national industry scheme is used to provide compensation to investors only in the areas not covered by an adviser’s own PI insurance.

Hristodoulidis says the FPA is still grappling over how a national scheme would be funded, particularly whether it would need to impose a levy on the industry on an ongoing basis, or only in response to specific requests for compensation.

But he says the Government will have to find a solution to the adequate compensations arrangements question, or face putting many financial planners out of business.

“You don’t want to have a situation that because of the adequate compensation provisions in the act, it means [financial planners] going out of business,” Hristodoulidis says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 2 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 16 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

20 hours 42 minutes ago