FPA concerns over ASIC funding model

financial planning FPA treasury ASIC

23 October 2015
| By Jayson Forrest |
image
image
expand image

The FPA has provided Treasury with its submission on the proposed industry funding model for ASIC. In its submission, the FPA has highlighted its concerns about the equity of the proposed model, particularly in respect to its impact on small licensee businesses.

In its submission, the FPA has recommended that Treasury consider reworking the industry funding model for ASIC, including:

  • The model to appropriately reflect ASIC's activity that is necessary to oversee the risk posed to consumers based on the scale of the advice operations and other risk factors.
  • Comply with Government policy regarding small business.
  • Ensure the funding model is linked to the larger reform agenda, particularly the FSI, PJC Inquiry, and the ASIC Capability Review.

As part of its submission, the FPA has recommended that ASIC's annual funding levy be made up of two parts:

A. Part A — a revised model that is equitable across the financial services industry and supports the role of small business.

B. Part B — an overlay of risk-based concessions that incentivise professional behaviour and encourage businesses to reduce their consumer risk, and the regulatory activity required by ASIC.

The FPA has also recommended that licence fees related to AFSLs reflect the scale and complexity of the financial advice operations of the business and therefore, the resources by ASIC required to assess the application.

For example, the FPA believes the model could consider a licence fee range that separates the issuing of products versus no product. In addition, the FPA recommends there could also be alternate segmentation that could help in scaling the licensing fees.

In terms of the introduction of an industry funding model for ASIC scheduled for the 2016-17 budget year, the FPA has voiced its concerns about the impact of the timing of the proposed new costs, particularly for small licensee businesses. As such, the FPA has called for any introduction of an industry funding model for ASIC to be delayed by at least 12 months, with the funding model then introduced in stages.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

6 days 16 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS