FPA attacks proposal

financial services licence FPA fpa chief executive australian financial services chief executive officer

25 May 2000
| By Julie Bennett |

The FPA has vowed to fight CLERP 6 proposals which allow accountants who are members of professional bodies to operate outside the licencing scheme.

The FPA has vowed to fight CLERP 6 proposals which allow accountants who are members of professional bodies to operate outside the licencing scheme.

Under the CLERP proposal, an exemption from holding an financial services licence will be allowed when a financial service is provided by a person who is a member of a declared professional body (DPB).

The DPB may be recognised by ASIC providing the members are adequately trained and supervised; there is a compensation scheme for losses by clients; and an internal and external dispute resolution procedure is in place. The body must also have adequate powers to discipline and remove members.

FPA chief executive officer Michael McKenna says that while the association welcomes the introduction of a single licencing system, the DPB exemption is a key concern.

“The FPA supports the adoption of a single uniform licencing system, but we see the declaration of self-regulatory organisations as a retrograde step,” he says.

“This will undermine the level playing field concept through different standards of entry and conduct which will create inconsistencies and gaps when compared with the full licencing requirements.”

FPA professional standards senior manager Ken Breakspear, who prepared the association’s submission on CLERP 6, says many DPBs don’t have the same standards so CLERP will allow “a soft regulated approval” to members of some of these bodies gaining an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).

“It also gives a competitive advantage to accountants and actuaries as they will only need a bit of training to get a AFSL,” he says.

Breakspear says you only have to look at the mess the UK got into a few years ago with self-regulation and that should serve as a warning for Australia.

“The FPA is very concerned about the structural weaknesses in the self regulation model and the fact of its apparent failure in the United Kingdom financial services system (giving rise to a single licensing framework),” the FPA’s submission says.

Breakspear says the proposed legislation only requires DPB members to be “adequately trained”.

“This seems more akin to the training of authorised representatives and not the standards of entry for licensees, which should include relevant competence, skills, experience and sufficient resources (including financial, technological and human resources) and adequate risk management systems necessary to properly provide the financial services,” he says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS