FPA acts on Westpoint complaints

property commissions financial planners financial planning association australian securities and investments commission financial advice

27 February 2006
| By Ross Kelly |

The Financial Planning Association has confirmed that it is investigating six complaints about its members in relation to the failed Westpoint group.

The FPA would not disclose which members, or how many, were involved in the investigations process.

Although the FPA had described the 10 to 13 per cent commissions allegedly received from Westpoint by some financial planners as seeming “unreasonably high”, it is maintaining that commission-based selling of financial advice is acceptable, as long as it is clearly disclosed.

“Commissions of around 10 per cent seem unreasonably high in respect to the investments that have been recommended to the clients. The FPA doesn’t have any specific requirement about the level of commission which is payable to advisers,” FPA chair Corinna Dieters told the ABC last Thursday night.

Up to 100 financial planners are expected to by sued over Westpoint by close to 2,000 investors in a case being prepared by lawyers Slater and Gordon and bankrolled by IMF.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is also investigating financial planners who recommended Westpoint products.

ASIC chair Jeffrey Lucy said around 50 parties, both individuals and organisations, were currently being investigated by the regulator. At a recent Senate estimates committee he named Westpoint’s financial planning arm, the Keble Group, as one of these organisations.

Lucy also confirmed research houses that recommended Westpoint products, including independent research house Property Investment Research, were also coming in for close scrutiny.

ASIC, meanwhile, has sent out a press release defending allegations that it was too slow to warn consumers about two Westpoint related investments.

ASIC said that in June 2004 it wrote to all investors who held promissory notes issued by Emu Brewery Mezzanine Limited and Bayshore Mezzanine Pty Ltd alerting them to proceedings commenced in the Supreme Court of Western Australia.

“Concerns have been raised that ASIC did not alert investors to the allegations raised by ASIC in these proceedings. This is simply not true. As well, these concerns were well known to the Westpoint group and its advisers,” Lucy said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS