FOS raises concerns over renaming general advice

ASIC/financial-ombudsman-service/financial-advice/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

8 September 2014
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

A proposal to rename general advice as "sales" or "product information" is not an adequate solution to the problems that arise from conflicted remuneration, according to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

In its submission to the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), the FOS warned that the proposed renaming of general advice could lead to "the re-emergence of a commission driven sales culture of the type that existed in the tied agent arrangements in insurance and financial advice prior to changes in regulation in the mid-1990s".

FOS also raised concerns that consumers could be unable to distinguish between sales, product information and general advice, if the FSI proposal went through.

"The introduction of any such distinction would require careful review of whether it was necessary to introduce further requirements that certain types of complex products can only be sold to retail customers on an ‘advised only' basis," FOS said.

"This would introduce a new set of complexities into the regulation framework for consumers to navigate."

While had concerns over the proposal to rename general advice, FOS was largely supportive of other views raised in the FSI's interim report.

"FOS supports the views of the inquiry on the impact of conflicted remuneration on the ability of consumers to access advice they need and can trust," FOS said.

"FOS also supports industry and regulatory initiatives to improve competency, training and professional requirements for advisers, and the concept of a register of individual advisers."

The FOS submission also recommended increasing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) powers to enable "early supervisory intervention in order to limit serious conduct problems".

"This would require a regulatory philosophy that combines an early intervention ‘supervisory' approach with a strong focus on enforcement when the law is breached," FOS said.

"The UK regulator has powers to appoint an external party to undertake an independent review of a firm's activities (which, for example, cause concern or require further analysis).

"We recommend a similar power should be considered for ASIC."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 16 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo