FOS calls for empowerment of ASIC

ASIC financial services industry australian securities and investments commission director

12 August 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has called for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to be better empowered to track and deal with authorised representatives who move through the industry despite leaving clients with uncompensated losses.

In a submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Financial Services, FOS has made clear that it believes there are shortcomings in the manner in which ASIC can deal with wrongdoing in the financial services industry.

Citing a licensee who was found by the Finance Industry Complaints Service to be in multiple disputes, to have misappropriated client funds and to have been placed into voluntary liquidation, the submission said the licensee’s sole director had remained in the financial services industry as an authorised representative of another licensee for some time after the misappropriations before being banned by ASIC for six years.

“Generally, ASIC can only make a banning order against a person after giving the person an opportunity to appear or be represented at a hearing and to make submissions on the matter,” the FOS submission said.

“For the current regime to protect consumers, ASIC has to have highly effective ways to obtain information about threats to consumers and have the resources required to conduct any necessary investigations and hearings promptly.

“In our view, ASIC should investigate any case where authorised representatives remain in the industry after leaving their clients with uncompensated losses and should expedite the investigation and any necessary hearing in such a case,” the submission said.

It said if these steps were not taken quickly, the risk of further losses to clients increased.

The submission argued that measures might be needed to make it easier for ASIC to identify situations similar to the case it had cited, with, for instance, an authorised representative moving to another licensee being required to provide ASIC with information about past activities that would highlight involvement in financial losses.

“A simpler alternative may be for ASIC to make greater use of the information that it receives about authorised representatives moving between licensees,” the FOS submission said. “Licensing arrangements may also need to be reviewed to ensure they require licence applications to include sufficient information about past activities of proposed authorised representatives."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 days 15 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

6 days 21 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

5 days 19 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

4 days 21 hours ago