Former Sentinel adviser banned
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has banned a financial adviser and former authorised representative of Queensland-based independently-owned Sentinel Private Wealth from providing financial services for five years.
The corporate regulator banned Stephen Michael Beckton after finding he did not comply with financial services laws on several occasions while he was a representative of Sentinel from September 2013 to October 2016.
A review of his advice found he had recommended clients change superannuation and insurance products where there was little benefit but high cost to the client.
This resulted in increased adviser fees and commissions for Beckton from insurers.
In doing so, ASIC found Beckton had failed to act in the best interests of his clients, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation of their existing super and insurance products, and given advice that may have left them in a worse position than before adhering to his advice.
He also failed to provide appropriate advice to his clients, failed to properly disclose fees, and failed to prioritise clients' interests ahead of his own when he knew there would be a conflict of interest.
ASIC deputy chair, Peter Kell, said: "Financial advisers must put their clients' interests ahead of their own. Super switching that provides little benefit to the client but is very profitable to advisers is clearly unacceptable".
Beckton's banning will be recorded on ASIC's register of financial advisers. He has a right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of ASIC's decision.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
