Former Saxby Bridge advisers banned

commissions/investments-commission/

30 May 2002
| By Kate Kachor |

TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)has banned two former Saxby Bridge Financial Planning representatives for a total of six years after investigations revealed both planners had breached the law on more than one occasion.

Mark Patrick Erichsen and David Charles Steer have been banned from acting as a representative of a dealer or an investment adviser for four and two years respectively.

An ASIC investigation found a number of breaches of the law in Erichsen’s advice to some clients between 18 November 1996 and 2 July 2001.

The investigation found that Erichsen failed to document the financial and personal details of certain clients sufficiently to adequately assess and make appropriate investment recommendations.

He also placed incorrect statements in recommendation reports to justify recommending high risk tax driven managed business investments, and failed to understand the meaning of diversification, which resulted in some clients investing in too many high risk tax driven managed investments.

In similar circumstances, Steer was banned after ASIC found he had also breached the law in his advice to certain clients between 18 November 1996 and 4 July 2001.

An ASIC investigation into Steer’s financial undertakings found he failed to adequately assess his clients’ risk profiles so that certain clients were recommended inappropriately high risk investments. Steer also failed to adequately advise his clients of the possibility that tax deductions on certain tax-driven investment schemes could be rejected by the Australian Tax Office and the impact such a consequence would have on their future financial position.

The regulator also found Steer had failed to ensure that client loan application documents were completed accurately, which resulted in a risk of loans being approved for investments that certain clients later could not afford.

During the investigation, ASIC found that both advisers had also failed to adequately disclose all of the commissions and benefits they might receive from a client taking up a particular investment recommendation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

4 days 18 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 2 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND