Former Bell Potter adviser jailed
A former Bell Potter Securities adviser has been jailed for one year after his original suspended sentence was quashed following an appeal.
An investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found Lawson Donald had dishonestly used his position as an employee of Bell Potter to gain advantage for himself or someone else by rebooking share trades, or transferring them from one client account to another.
In April this year, Lawson pleaded guilty to dishonest conduct involving more than $1.7 million, receiving a suspended jail term after entering a good behaviour bond.
However, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions appealed the sentence on the basis that it was manifestly inaccurate.
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal sentenced Donald, a former first-grade captain at Sydney's Randwick District Football Club and Australian Barbarians player, to two years in prison to be released after one year.
"The [original] sentence failed to reflect the gravity of the offence and failed in particular to serve as an effective deterrent to other similarly intelligent, competitive professionals in the financial markets," the court said.
"It has also been repeatedly observed that the real bite of general deterrence takes hold only when a custodial sentence is imposed ... notwithstanding judicial statements to the effect that a suspended sentence is a sentence of imprisonment, the community (including those in 'white collar' occupations) might be justifiably forgiven for thinking that an offender who is serving a bond in the community has escaped meaningful punishment."
ASIC commissioner Greg Tanzer said the Australian financial system relied on gatekeepers like advisers doing the right thing to ensure investors are confident when they participate in the market.
"This sentence recognises the seriousness of Donald's conduct and will serve to deter others from engaging in similar behaviour," Tanzer said.
Recommended for you
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
Lower fees and trustworthiness are the top factors enticing unadvised Australians to seek a financial adviser, according to Fidelity International, common across all generations.
