Forex Capital sued for unconscionable conduct and conflicted remuneration

ASIC forex capital trading Forex CT OTC derivatives

17 July 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The corporate watchdog has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives trader Forex Capital Trading and its sole director, Shlomo Yoshai.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) allege the firm engaged in a system of unconscionable conduct that was aided by Yoshai.

The alleged conduct would attract a maximum penalty of $420,000 for an individual and $2,100,000 for a body corporate.

This alleged conduct included:

  • Using high pressure sales tactics, such as offering incentives (credits and rebates) to encourage clients to transfer more money to Forex CT;
  • Recommending trading strategies that were inappropriate to clients;
  • Making false or misleading statements to clients;
  • Implementing and encouraging a trading floor culture that was directed towards maximising trading volume and client deposits rather than promoting a culture of compliance with applicable legal requirements;
  • Establishing and implementing incentives for clients to deposit funds and disincentives for clients to withdraw funds from their trading accounts; and
  • Failing to ensure compliance with financial services laws.

ASIC also alleged that the firm contravened a ban on conflicted remuneration under the Corporations Act by paying account manager bonuses primarily on client “net deposits” and failed to act in the best interests of clients when giving personal advice.

These contraventions could attract a maximum penalty of up to $1,000,000 for a body corporate.

ASIC also alleged that Yoshai failed to exercise his powers and discharge his duties as a director and this could attract a maximum penalty of $200,000.

“ASIC seeks declarations that Forex CT engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and, as the holder of an Australian Financial Services (AFS) licence, contravened its obligations under s912A of the Corporations Act,” ASIC said.

“This includes failing to do all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by the AFS licence were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS