FOFA not designed to address vertical integration
The Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms were never intended to address vertical integration and this is something that needs to be addressed separately, according to the Financial Planning Association (FPA).
The FPA head of policy and government relations, Ben Marshan said FOFA was designed to ensure that irrespective of how an individual planner was licensed, the interests of the consumer would be prioritised over anything else.
“On the whole, what it’s done is it created an advice process where clients’ interests are put first before the planners, it’s created an advice process where the planner has a legal obligation to make sure they really understand the clients and provide them with strategies and solutions that will improve their financial position,” Marshan said.
“What I would say is that vertical integration is a totally separate issue that probably needs to be looked at and dealt with.”
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) deputy chair, Peter Kell discussed vertical integration in the context of the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry and said while FOFA had helped raise standards and remove remuneration conflicts, ASIC’s initial assessment of vertical integration in financial advice revealed most customer funds for vertically integrated institutions were still invested in related-party products.
Marshan said there was a broad spectrum in the quality of advice given to consumers at both ends in both independent advice practices and vertically integrated businesses.
Financial planners within vertically integrated businesses had developed products that delivered “phenomenal” outcomes, while there were instances where even independent advice businesses had delivered poor quality advice, and vice versa.“There’s a spectrum at both ends and I think, does vertical integration need to be looked at? Absolutely. But is that what FOFA was designed to do? No,” Marshan said.
He added that some of the bad news stories of poor conduct by advisers were example of pre-FOFA behaviour and consumer outcomes, and this would gradually decrease as the industry began to witness the effects of FOFA reforms.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
