Fines for super shirkers on the rise
By John Wilkinson
FINES issued to employers for not paying superannuation to their employees have quadrupled over the past five years, casting a pall over the ability of the super system to cope under choice of fund.
In the 2000 financial year, the Australian Taxation Office raised $82.46 million in superannuation guarantee charges. This jumped to $380.8 million in the 2004 financial year.
The charge is applied to employers who fail to provide a minimum level of superannuation support and is calculated at 10 per cent a year on the outstanding amount.
Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) president Susan Ryan said her organisation was concerned that employers weren’t paying super contributions and that the figures had jumped alarmingly.
Ryan said the growing rate of unpaid super did not bode well for choice of fund.
“The figures will get worse with choice as there will be even more confusion among employers over paying super,” she said.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia principal researcher Ross Clare said while 90 per cent of employers complied with the superannuation guarantee contributions, the arrival of choice was going to make contributing more complex for employers.
“If it is a company with one employee, then choice is simple, but for companies with thousands of employees it is very complex,” he said.
“The problems may range from contributions being paid to the wrong fund or not paid at all… the compliance burden will grow.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
