Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Financial services laws too prescriptive

financial-service/law/

3 July 2015
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

Financial services laws and regulations have to keep pace with financial technological developments, particularly in relation to peer-to-peer lending, according to Holley Nethercote.

Partner, Grant Holley, said the investment side of peer-to-peer lending, where investors pour money in, needs to be a registered managed investment scheme under the Corporations Act 2001, and this could be expensive.

Holley said the applications of the provisions, which was inserted into the Corporations Act by the Managed Investments Act in 1998, can be quite burdensome as they require a constitution for the scheme, compliance plans, a compliance committee, and they have to be a responsible entity if they do not have enough independent directors on the board.

Peer-to-peer lending attempts to match investors with credit using efficient technology in a way that is simple and cost effective.

"The managed investments scheme and everything that goes along with operating a registered managed investment scheme tends to be slow, expensive, and not really tailored to these kinds of technologies," Holley said.

Holley believes many components of financial services laws, including laws relating to peer-to-peer lending are too prescriptive at present.

"I think the law could be more principles-based, but less prescriptive. For people that are actually getting into peer-to-peer lending, I think the fit and proper tests should be quite high, so that you know you've got honest people with no poor backgrounds and so on getting involved in the industry," he said.

Prescriptive laws beget confusion and lead to the industry focusing on the prescription rather than meeting the actual objectives of that prescription, Holley added.

Holley also said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission could offer class orders for peer-to-peer lenders, which would mean that as long as they fulfilled their class order conditions, they would not have to comply with the managed investments scheme provisions.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND