Financial regulators dragging the chain
Australia's three key financial services regulators — the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) — may move with alacrity in their own enforcement activity but have proved less fleet-footed in meeting the needs of the Parliament.
A recent survey conducted by the Rule of Law Institute of Australia (ROLIA) found that when it came to answering questions asked by Senators during Senate Estimates late last year, all three agencies were late more than a quarter of the time, with the ATO being the worst offender.
The survey found that ASIC was late in delivering responses 35 per cent of the time, while APRA was a little better and was late on only 28 per cent of occasions. However the ATO was the worst-performed financial services regulator, being late with respect to 44 per cent of questions asked.
However, when it comes to being really unresponsive to Senate questions, Treasury, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and the Inspector General of Taxation had the worst records, with the competition watchdog answering only one question on time and being late on 99 per cent of other occasions, while the Inspector General of Taxation did not answer any questions at all in the period — in similar fashion to the Fiscal Group within Treasury which also scored a perfect 100 per cent for not answering questions on time.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
