Financial advisers questioning risk profiling
Thought leaders among dealer groups are increasingly questioning the "one-dimensional" practice of risk profiling for clients in the face of increasing longevity and inflation risk, according to Challenger chief executive - life, Richard Howes.
While a client in the retirement phase will clearly have a different situation and risks compared to one in the accumulation phase, the practice of allocating them to standardised asset allocations based on a risk profile is becoming less popular.
Instead, advisers are increasingly adopting more of an objective-based advice model that focuses on the minimum level of required income, Howes said.
So in advising retirees, advisers end up seeking something that looks a lot like the aged pension, which in many ways is the perfect retirement product - it's just not big enough, he said.
That's leading to a big increase in demand for "private aged pensions" or inflation-linked lifetime annuities, he said.
Adopting that model allows advisers to take a layered approach - taking care of the minimum required income then liberates the adviser and client to use the growth assets to meet aspirational objectives, Howes said.
He said that recently a whole cohort of retirees had been selling their growth assets, which illustrated sequencing risks - if a retiree suffered big losses early in retirement, that could render the remaining assets incapable of servicing retirement needs.
Recommended for you
AZ NGA’s CEO has unpacked how its recent $345 million debt facility from Barings will accelerate its advice network’s growth ambitions, and allow its largest firms to access a greater source of funding.
Research by Colonial First State has found women are reluctant to make retirement preparations, despite 62 per cent saying they feel that they are unable to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Managed accounts saw net inflows of $14.3 billion in the six months to 31 December, according to the latest IMAP FUM census.
The increased bids for Insignia from Bain and CC Capital value the company at $3.3 billion, while there is still a possibility for competing bids from rival players such as Brookfield.
