Fees remain static after GST

property bonds

20 September 2000
| By Jason |

Management fees for most wholesale managed funds have not climbed following the introduction of the GST earlier this year with most choosing to hold fees or decrease them, according to a report from InTech Financial Services.

Management fees for most wholesale managed funds have not climbed following the introduction of the GST earlier this year with most choosing to hold fees or decrease them, according to a report from InTech Financial Services.

The report says the reduced input tax credits (RITC) regime applied to managed funds has been the principal reason for the small number of funds increasing fees. As a result of the RITC, the maximum increase on fee levels would then be around 2.5 per cent.

Just over a quarter of growth funds, those with a large majority of local or international shares, have increased fee levels with most holding steady and 16 per cent actually dropping fees.

The majority of Australian share funds, conservative growth funds and international share funds also remained static with about 60 per cent choosing to maintain fees at current levels.

Listed property was the only market segment to buck the trend with more than half increasing fees in line with, and as a result of, the GST.

However the report says the reason for the lack of movement in fees is many managers are waiting for the new tax system to settle in and may make alterations as current prospectuses roll over.

The report also found fund managers offering funds in cash and growth classes were offering competitive fees to investors but those in the conservative growth, international shares and bonds and listed property classes could be more competitive on fees.

Larger investors should also negotiate fees, according to the report, with around half of most funds offering a reduction.

However this reduction averages about five basis points for an investment even when the invested amount reaches $50 million.

“When converted to dollar amounts, it would seem that the modest level of additional work and expenses incurred by the manager does not warrant the excess amount paid by larger investors,” the report says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 22 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 13 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago