Fee for service still an initial hurdle
A fee-for-service model can represent a hurdle to attracting new clients, according to a Sydney financial planner.
Nigel Stewart, chairman of financial planning firm Stewart Partners, said the “best practice” approach of charging fee for service can penalise firms that employ this model.
Stewart said this model “often penalises our firm when attracting new clients as they may believe our approach is more expensive than their current arrangements”.
“However, if we are able to do a full cost analysis [for prospective clients] – a task even we often find difficult to complete given the lack of transparency in financial services – we typically find our approach significantly reduces their investment costs.”
Stewart said his firm has charged a fee for service since 1998 to ensure transparency of investment costs for clients. In a submission to the current joint committee inquiry into financial services, Stewart said he believes the remuneration models “used by many advisers can drive behaviour that is inappropriate” and not in clients’ best interests.
He believes the current commission remuneration model has inherent conflicts of interest “that cannot be avoided or diminished to an extent” that the model “will ever be acceptable”.
Recommended for you
Professional services group AZ NGA has made its first acquisition since announcing a $240 million strategic partnership with US manager Oaktree Capital Management in September.
As Insignia Financial looks to bolster its two financial advice businesses, Shadforth and Bridges, CEO Scott Hartley describes to Money Management how the firm will achieve these strategic growth plans.
Centrepoint Alliance says it is “just getting started” as it looks to drive growth via expanding all three streams of advisers within the business.
AFCA’s latest statistics have shed light on which of the major licensees recorded the most consumer complaints in the last financial year.
