Fee-for-service driving passive investments
A change in adviser remuneration structure is causing a structural shift in asset allocation away from active products towards more passive products such as exchange traded funds (ETFs) and passive funds, according to Fidelity Investment Managers.
This is being done to bring costs to balance the new fees now being charged by financial advisers so they can justify the level of fees being charged, a situation that has already been seen in the UK, according to Fidelity managing director Gerard Doherty.
“Fidelity is largely an active house. We’ve always had a strong belief that active can add value over time but we are seeing that pressure on active management,” Doherty said.
A greater weight of flows into passive products could potentially create opportunities for an active manager to exploit, but if there is a big shift of money away from active managers, that raises questions over whether all active managers will be able to survive to take advantage, he said.
“It also calls into question the merits of cap weighted indexes. If you see a higher volume of money going into index management, and it’s sort of self feeding, there are lots of people thinking about how to benchmark performance, and are cap weighted indexes the best way to do it or are fundamental indexes better,” he said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
