Fee-based model pushes up PI costs

remuneration insurance fee-for-service professional indemnity investments commission FPA

13 August 2003
| By Ben Abbott |

Advisers using a fee-for-service model of financial planning remuneration could face increased professional indemnity (PI) insurance burdens, according to prominent planning industry insurance broker Brian King.

King, who is managing director of Crown Insurance, says underwriters perceive a different level of risk between an individual agent being paid a commission and a planner charging a fee-for-service.

“Underwriters appear to be much more jittery about fee income than those advisers who get commission income,” King says.

King says although this has been the case for some time, the Australian Consumers’ Association andAustralian Securities and Investments Commission’s survey, which was “just another nail in the coffin” for underwriters on financial planners, seems to have made fee-for-service more of an issue for them.

He says the reason appears to be because those on commission-based income predominantly use the recommended lists of their principals who are responsible for their actions.

King says the risk exposure from an underwriter’s perspective appears to be much more on the dealer, as opposed to fee-for-service income which is more advice based.

TheFinancial Planning Association(FPA) disagrees with this position on fee-for-service and its affect on PI, saying the use of fee-for-service modelling does not make a difference to premiums.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS