Federal Opposition lambasts Govt on short-selling
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC's) decision to extend its ban on covered short-selling has prompted strong criticism by the Federal Opposition.
The Shadow Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Pearce claimed the decision to extend the short-selling ban had been partly forced by the Government’s inability to regulate a disclosure regime.
As well, Pearce suggested that the Government’s legislative efforts on short-selling had proved ineffective.
“Although ASIC cited continued global turmoil as the catalyst for extending the ban until 31 May, a significant compounding factor has been the ineffectiveness of the empty Corporations Amendment (Short-Selling) Bill,” he said.
Pearce said the legislation had not contained sufficient detail on how the disclosure regime should operate, and this meant the regulator had been continually forced to issue orders.
“The bare-bones legislation, heavily reliant on non-existent regulation, still fails to specify how the disclosure regime would operate in terms of stock measure and regularity,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
