FDS presents client retention challenge
Many financial planners might struggle to articulate their value to passive clients come fee disclosure statement (FDS) time, according to Elixir Consulting managing director, Sue Viskovic.
Once advisers get their head around the technicalities of the FDS requirement, Viskovic said the challenge would be around making sure the clients receive the information well, particularly if there had been no regular engagement.
Elixir will provide training to advisers around this issue, but Viskovic said not all advisers would struggle.
"The clients who are already engaged with an adviser are not an issue, because advisers deliver their FDS in person when they come in for their review," she said.
"The actual document might be a bit different, but the conversation will be similar to what the client is used to."
Other clients, however, might not be used to a re-focus on fees.
"The biggest issue would probably be clients who do pay fees, but don't actually participate and come in on a regular basis for their review," Viskovic said.
When the industry started to weed out commissions, many planners started charging asset-based fees - or a commission/fee combination - but many planners failed to let their clients know about the change in pricing and the ongoing services provided, Viskovic found.
"This is where the practical reality comes in," she said. "If you have to send out that compliance document that says ‘hello, you haven't heard from me in a while but by the way I'm earning all this money from you" then obviously that could mean that clients might not receive that information well."
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
