FASEA releases draft exam guidance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2de98/2de98aef4268aad1f54b5d39f41bf4c21acc804d" alt="education standards image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2de98/2de98aef4268aad1f54b5d39f41bf4c21acc804d" alt="education standards image"
The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) has released proposed guidance on the Financial Adviser Examination that is flagged to form a compulsory part of its much-debated education reforms.
The Authority proposed that the exam would test advisers’ practical application of knowledge in:
- Corporations Act (emphasis on Chapter 7 – financial services and markets);
- The FASEA Code of Ethics;
- Behavioural finance – client and consumer behaviour, engagement and decision making;
- Financial advice construction – suitability of advice aligned to different consumer groups; and
- Applied ethical and professional reasoning and communication.
All advisers registered as authorised representatives prior to 31 December, 2018 would have to pass the exam before the start of 2021. From January, next year, new entrants or those returning to the industry would have to pass the exam after completing their tertiary degree and before commencing their professional year.
The exam would consist of both multiple choice and short answer questions, and advisers would have two chances to re-sit the exam.
FASEA was currently undertaking a procurement process with specialist service providers around the exam’s development and delivery.
Feedback submissions to the Authority on the proposed exam would close 31 July, at five pm.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.