Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FASEA releases ASIC code submission

FASEA/Financial-Adviser-Standards-and-Ethics-Authority/ASIC/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/code-of-ethics/standard-3/Senate-Estimates/

17 December 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) has released the content of an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) submission dealing with the adviser code of ethics including the regulator’s view of the controversial Standard 3.

The ASIC submission was released by FASEA in the context of answering a question on notice during Senate Estimates and reveals that ASIC was urging further guidance around Standard 3, in the form of examples of the kind of conduct that would fall outside the standards and “would best encourage improved behaviour by financial advisers”.

“We query whether ‘and as an independently minded professional’ is a necessary addition to the standard. It appears to mean something different from acting with "personal integrity". Should it be identified in a separate standard?” it said.

The ASIC submission outlined by FASEA also expressed concern with respect to there being room for differing interpretations as to what conduct is being carried out.

It also stated: "...our reading of the code is that it should apply to relevant providers even when they are dealing with wholesale clients. While, to be a relevant provider, a person must be authorised to give advice to retail clients, relevant providers may also regularly provide advice to wholesale clients. If it is the case that the code is intended to apply to services provided to wholesale clients, we think this would benefit from further clarity in the code.

“Similarly, we understand that the code is intended to apply to relevant providers even when they are providing services other than personal advice (e.g. general advice). While this is implied in some of the standards to an extent, it would be worth making this clear in the code”.

The FASEA answer to the question on notice when live on the Parliamentary website this afternoon after yesterday being deemed “late” and “unanswered”.

FASEA also indicated it was reviewing its ability to make submissions from financial advisers and other respondents to its consultation process publicly available on its website.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 21 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND