FASEA Ethics Code could’ve prevented RC misconduct

FASEA Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority code of ethics Banking Royal Commission Royal Commission RC Deen Sanders

21 February 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

Following the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) Code of Ethics could prevent misconduct of the type uncovered by the Banking Royal Commission even though they aren’t subject to legal penalties, former chief executive of the body, Deen Sanders, has said.

Breaches of the Code would not be subject to criminal or civil penalties, but instead come under the remit of monitoring bodies, which would have investigative powers when it came to breaches or potential breaches.

“Institutions will instead need to increase the focus on ethics, professionalism, individual accountability, and culture to avoid breaches of the Code,” Sanders said at the SMSF National Conference this morning, arguing that “codes of ethics should be above the law, they should be aspirational”. This latter point was also made by Commissioner Kenneth Hayne.

Sanders pointed to the Code’s first standard, which requires advisers to act in accordance with the law and not try to circumvent its intent, as especially prohibitive of the misconduct heard by the Royal Commission.

“It requires that you must not seek to avoid the Code,” Sanders said. Such behaviour was rampant in the behaviour revealed before the Royal Commission, Hayne found, and Sanders said that the industry had looked at how it could get around rules rather than how it could meet them.

“Now even by having a conversation about that could prove a breach of the Code,” Sanders said.

A second theme to much of the poor conduct brought before the Royal Commission, and the subject of several recommendations, was that of conflicted advice and commission schemes.

Both Standards Two and Five of the Code could have prevented some of this misconduct, with the former preventing advisers from acting where they have a conflict of interest, and the latter requiring that all advice and financial product recommendations must be in clients’ best interests, appropriate to their circumstances, and understood by the client.

Sanders also said that the Code of Ethics’ provisions could be broadly grouped under the goals of ethical behaviour, quality process, client care, and professional commitment.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS