FASEA code more legal than ethical
The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority’s (FASEA’s) new Code of Ethics has the industry surprised with the duplication of current obligations under Chapter seven of the Corporations Act.
Speaking with Money Management, associate professor at Deakin University’s Business School, Adrian Raftery, said he was concerned the Code imposed more legal obligations as opposed to ethical duties.
“There was definitely improvement in the wording from the previous [draft], however we’re pretty concerned that a lot of the best interest duty, remuneration, misleading and deceptive statements – its more Chapter seven of the Corporations law,” he said.
He suggested given the legal obligations the Code imposes, and should the Authority be “heading down that route”, the name should be changed to ‘Code of Professional Conduct’, rather than ‘Code of Ethics’.
Raftery said he also hoped for a bit more depth, given other Codes tend to provide more detail in their definitions.
“There seemed to be a lot less detail in this draft Code than what you probably would have expected,” he said. “We expected a bit more substance, a bit more guidance for advisers or relevant providers as they’re going to be.”
Deakin Business School suggested the Code of Professional Conduct should have incorporated issues like record-keeping; confidentiality; transfer of clients to other relevant providers; custody of client assets; anti-money laundering procedures; and fees.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
