FASEA bypassed consultation on code guidance

phil kewin AFA Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority FASEA

23 October 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) could have conducted a pre-release consultation around its code of ethics guidelines with the major financial adviser groups but chose not to do so.

Instead the authority has run into a barrage of criticism from individual advisers and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and is now offering a consultation process in November.

However, AFA chief executive, Phil Kewin has told Money Management that he has concerns about the effectiveness of a consultation process in November when the code of ethics is due to be implemented in from 1 January.

Kewin was commenting after he signed off a communication to AFA members in which he said the AFA had used code of ethics guidance released last Friday to go beyond its remit with respect to the management of conflicts of interest to “create its own laws, way above current laws”.

“We simply do not understand how it is possible, when the Corporations Act only requires conflicts to be managed, and the law specifically permits life insurance commissions and other conflicted arrangements, that FASEA could issue a Code of Ethics, that is binding on all financial advisers that appears to completely ban conflicts of interest,” the AFA communication said.

In a subsequent interview with Money Management, Kewin said the issues relate to the FASEA code of ethics guidance could have been resolved if the authority had lived up to an undertaking to consult with adviser groups before it released the guidance.

“Now they are promising us a consultation process in November but I have concerns about how that will work because the code of ethics is due to come into effect on 1 January, next year,” he said.

Kewin expressed particular concern about the fact that the original Standard 3 in the code, dealing with conflicts of interest or duty had been viewed as “reasonable” by advisers but that it had now been subject to substantial change.

Kewin’s comments have come amid concerns that consumer representatives on the FASEA board have been allowed to exercise undue influence.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 19 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS