Failing grade for Australian multi-managers

24 September 2008
| By George Liondis |

Despite claims that multi-manager products will perform regardless of market conditions, Standard & Poor’s peer group review of Australian equity multi-managers has found they have struggled to meet their investment objectives over an extended period of time.

S&P awarded five investment strategies three stars and downgraded two others following the review, which covered four managers offering seven strategies.

According to S&P, it’s widely accepted that timing when to invest in growth or value style funds is a very difficult thing to do, as both perform differently through the market cycle.

That said, multi-manager products are designed to take this timing burden away from investors by “constructing funds using the best managers from each style persuasion”.

“Aggregating these portfolios should result in a fund that is typically style-neutral, but that aims to benefit from the superior stock-picking skills of the underlying mangers over time.”

Despite this, S&P’s ‘Australian Equity — multi-manager peer group — 1 Equities — Quant review’ found many multi-managers struggled to meet their investment objectives over extended periods.

The strategies awarded three stars included Russell’s Australian share and opportunities funds, MLC’s growth and value style strategies, and Customer Choice’s Australian share fund. S&P rated both Advance’s and MLC’s Australian share strategies two stars.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

6 days 20 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS